Top Stories
ASIC Sounds Alarm to Sceptical Crowd at Sydney Digital Asset Event

Top Stories Tamfitronics

  • ASIC Commissioner, Alan Kirkland, flagged that most crypto-based businesses in Australia will require a financial services licence to avoid litigation in remarks made at the AFR’s Crypto and Digital Assets Summit on Monday.
  • Australia’s digital assets industry figures at the summit reacted with alarm to the comments, concerned this litigious approach coupled with Australia’s web3 legislative vacuum will continue to stifle innovation and drive developers overseas.
  • The government says it’s working to develop high quality legislation, though it has no timeline for when we might see it introduced into parliament.

The alarm was triggered in Australia’s crypto industry, both literally and figuratively, after remarks from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chief at the Australian Financial Review’s (AFR) Crypto and Digital Assets Summit on Monday.

In a discussion with the AFR reporter Max Mason, ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said most crypto businesses will need a financial services licence to operate, claiming this will minimise their risk of litigation. That sparked fear among Australia’s crypto industry that the regulator’s litigious approach to regulation was set to continue, something which is likely to further stifle innovation and may drive crypto startups offshore to friendlier jurisdictions.

Coincidentally, just after Kirkland left the stage a fire alarm went off, almost as if the industry’s concern following his comments had become so palpable they spontaneously took physical form.

Related: ASIC Says All Crypto Start-Ups Must Have Financial Services Licence

ASIC Taking Regulation Through Enforcement Style Approach

Much like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US, ASIC is essentially taking a regulation through enforcement approach to crypto. So far the regulator has primarily targeted operators who don’t have Australian Financial Services Licences (AFSL), resulting in the recommendation from ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland that essentially all crypto businesses should be licensed.

However, even businesses who’ve worked closely with ASIC while developing products have faced enforcement actions. While building its Finder Wallet product, Finder asked ASIC if it would need an AFSL, ASIC said it would not. Later, ASIC sued Finder for offering the product to consumers without the appropriate licences.

One of the key reasons for this regulation through enforcement approach is a lack of relevant legislation. The Australian digital assets industry is currently expected to comply with the nation’s corporations law, which was penned eight years before the launch of Bitcoin.

Commenting on Australia’s legislative vacuum the founder of Finder, Fred Schebester, said:

It would be a really good idea to try and update the law, as opposed to suing organisations and crushing the Australian economy and killing our innovation.

Fred Schebester, Founder of Finder

Crypto Pundits Call for Legislative Action

In a panel discussion following Kirkland’s remarks several prominent figures in Australia’s crypto industry highlighted the urgent need for updated legislation to create a regulatory environment in which web3 businesses have some certainty.

Former Treasury digital assets adviser, Chloe White, who is currently helping the Dubai government develop its crypto ecosystem, said that Australia was a long way from achieving even the very basics of legislation governing digital assets:

There’s so much work that needs to be done just to get Australia up to some basic standard.

Chloe White, Former Treasury digital assets adviser

White said that Australia desperately needs clear laws around crypto exchanges, crypto custody arrangements, anti-money laundering and crypto related financial advice.

The managing director of the Digital Economy Council of Australia, Amy-Rose Goodey, described how, due to the legal and regulatory uncertainty, businesses are currently developing cryptocurrency-based products in secret to avoid coming under the scrutiny of regulators:

Our start-ups are innovating in stealth mode behind closed doors, so that they’re not targeted.

Amy-Rose Goodey, Managing director of the Digital Economy Council of Australia

Goodey added that once the products are developed many founders plan to move overseas in order to avoid litigation from ASIC:

Once they build [a] product, they plan to go to Singapore or Dubai or even the US, depending on the election outcome.

Amy-Rose Goodey, Managing director of the Digital Economy Council of Australia

Federal Government Says Laws Are Coming…Eventually

The Albanese government said last year that draft legislation requiring crypto exchanges to have financial services licences would be released in 2024, but that’s now looking unlikely.

Speaking to the AFR about the need for updated laws governing crypto, the government’s special envoy for cybersecurity and digital resilience, Andrew Charlton, said that blockchain tech has the potential to dramatically boost productivity across many sectors of the Australian economy:

This is one of the biggest productivity opportunities the world has in front of it. We all look forward to a world where payments are instant, invisible, and free, and digital asset technology is the pathway towards that future.

Andrew Charlton, Australian Government’s special envoy for cybersecurity and digital resilience

Related: ASIC Sues ASX for Misleading Statements on Failed Blockchain Project; Exchange Faces Potential AU$500 Million Fine

Despite recognising the importance of blockchain and crypto, Charlton couldn’t put a timeframe on when we might see new legislation, saying “this reform is very important to the government, but we’re also working to get it right.”

Unsurprisingly, the opposition have been critical of the government’s delay in tabling legislation, with Liberal MP Andrew Bragg saying:

We’re now in a shocking situation where, effectively, the regulator is trying to step in and do part of the job of the legislature, which is very dangerous for the country.

Andrew Bragg, Liberal Member of Parliament

Science & Technology
Mark Zuckerberg Sounds Off on Developing AI: ‘I Don’t Think AI Technology Is a Thing That Should Be Hoarded’

Technology tamfitronics

AI may soon become a part of our everyday lives, but in a new interview with the YouTuber Kallaway, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested we may be thinking about the technology all wrong.

Zuckerberg spoke about most major companies and their desire to build one main AI, using Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s Chat GPT as examples. But for Meta, the strategy isn’t to develop one central AI — the company wants to create multiple programs.

“Our overall view is that this isn’t the type of thing that there should just be one of, people want to interact with lots of different people and businesses and there need to be a lot of different AIs that get created to reflect people’s different interests,” he explained.

Related: Meta AI Unveils First Two Versions of Llama 3

Meta is focusing on building the underlying technology (called Llama) for businesses and creators so that these entities can create their own AIs to reflect the needs of their businesses and communities, Zuck explained.

He also pointed out that the idea of working towards an almost “all-knowing” AI is offputting to him, and while he’s heard from other tech leaders who like this approach, he doesn’t agree.

“I don’t think AI technology is a thing that should be hoarded,” he said. “I find it a pretty big turnoff when people in the tech industry kind of talk about building this one true AI. It’s almost as if they think they’re creating God or something, and that’s just not what we’re doing. I don’t think that’s how this plays out.”

Related: What Is Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Salary, Security Costs?

Meta is currently testing a beta version of its Creator AI, which allows creators, like Kallaway, to test the software and see what a streamlined AI built for their specific audiences would be like.

Llama 3 was released in April 2024.

Top Stories
Stamp Cuban Sounds Horror on Bitcoin as Transaction Expenses Plunge Post-Halving

Top Stories Tamfitronics

  • The Bitcoin halving reduced miner rewards from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC at block 840,000, coinciding with excessive transaction expenses due to the the Runes originate.
  • Expenses first and fundamental establish surged to over US$146 for medium-precedence and $170 for excessive-precedence transactions, nonetheless hold since reduced to around $16.
  • Stamp Cuban suggests miners might possibly presumably also pivot to AI, exploiting excessive GPU request, as mining’s economics shift put up-halving.

The Bitcoin halving is over and what’s known as the ‘block subsidy’ – the reward miners get for their work – has reduced from 6.25 bitcoin to 3.125 bitcoin on block 840,000. To this point so gorgeous, nonetheless expenses on the network had been unusually excessive amid the Rune originate and members paying to embrace their names or messages within the principle transaction put up-halving.

Related: Swiss Push for Bitcoin Adoption: Advocates Urge Central Financial institution to Pioneer Crypto in Reserves

These expenses are unusually excessive, with over US$146 (AU$226) to pay for a medium-precedence and US$170 (AU$263) for a excessive-precedence transaction. By the time of writing these expenses hold come down critically, to US$15.84 (AU$24.53) and US$16.87 (AU$26.12) respectively.

Bitcoin transaction expenses, source: mempool.situation

Stamp Cuban acknowledged in a statement to The Block that it might possibly possibly get tougher for miners to receives a commission put up halving. The Dallas Mavericks owner acknowledged there might be an possibility for miners to procure up for misplaced income – and that’s in AI. In step with the Shark Tank host:

The of course attention-grabbing query connected to halving is the GPU market. Miners need extra power. There might be phenomenal request from AI for these GPUs. Will that distort the economics of mining? Now not merely from the attitude of payment, nonetheless might possibly presumably also or no longer it’s a ways a greater commerce to make exercise of these GPUs to put together models?

Stamp Cuban

Are Bitcoin Miners Ready to Pivot?

While ASIC machines frail by Bitcoin miners are no longer acceptable for AI computing, many are pondering a pivot to completely different technologies. As Nic Carter of Citadel Island Ventures comments:

In case you’re a bitcoin miner, your machines can’t be repurposed. It might possibly in point of fact most likely possibly be distinguished to amass catch recent machines in yell to procure it and the tips heart requirements are completely different for AI versus bitcoin mining.

Nic Carter from Citadel Island Ventures

CNBC experiences within the previous one year, there’s been a huge amplify within the request for AI compute and infrastructure in a position to handling the sizable workloads wished for recent machine discovering out applications.

In step with a file by CoinShares, extra miners are expected to transition in opposition to AI in vitality-get areas due to the the opportunity of increased income.

This pattern means that bitcoin mining might possibly presumably also an increasing kind of transfer to stranded vitality websites while investment in AI grows at extra get areas.

CoinShares

Internet a actually worthy crypto news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to the CNA newsletter

Lots of mining companies, together with BitDigital, Hive, Hut 8Terawulf, and Core Scientific, are both already engaged in AI operations or hold plans for AI expansion.