Politics
A whirlwind 24 hours for Trump on abortion: From the Politics Desk

Politics tamfitronics

Welcome to the online version ofFrom the Politics Deskan evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team’s latest reporting and analysis from the campaign trail, the White House and Capitol Hill.

In today’s edition, “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker breaks down how reproductive rights remain a thorny issue for the Donald Trump and the GOP. Plus, Washington correspondent Yamiche Alcindor examines how Kamala Harris is preparing for her first debate with Trump.

Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.


Reproductive rights remain a political land mine for Trump

By Kristen Welker

The past 24 hours have underscored how the abortion issue remains a major political land mine for Donald Trump and the GOP heading into the final stretch of the election.

It started on Thursday — the same day Vice President Kamala Harris sat down for her first major interview as the Democratic presidential nominee — when Trump told NBC News’ Dasha Burns that Florida’s six-week abortion ban was “too short” and that he would “be voting that we need more than six weeks” when asked about a ballot measure that would expand abortion access in his home state of Florida. His campaign clarified that evening that he had not yet taken a position on the proposed constitutional amendment.

And perhaps more significantly, on Thursday Trump also told Burns that he supported not only protecting access to in vitro fertilization, but also having the federal government or insurance companies pay for those costs.

Then, on Friday afternoon, after receiving swift backlash from the right, he came out against Florida’s abortion-rights ballot measure.

“So I think six weeks, you need more time than six weeks. I’ve disagreed with that right from the early primaries when I heard about it, I disagreed with it,” Trump said in comments to Fox News. “At the same time, the Democrats are radical, because the nine months is just a ridiculous situation where you can do an abortion in the ninth month. … So I’ll be voting no for that reason.”

Florida’s amendment would bar restrictions on abortion before fetal viability, around the 24th week of pregnancy, while ensuring exceptions to protect the health of the mother.

Trump’s statements on both abortion and IVF show how thorny the issues are for the Republican nominee — even when he appears to be staking out a position that’s more popular with the general electorate, according to the polls.

From one political side, there were anti-abortion conservatives, like Erick Erickson, who jeered Trump’s initial comments, warning they could cost him support from a critical slice of the GOP base. On the other, Harris’ campaign and Democrats continued to hammer Trump for his role in the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, which left the abortion issue to the states.

And then there’s the financial aspect of Trump’s plans. With the price tag for IVF treatments at approximately $20,000 each, having the government cover the cost would amount to billions in taxpayer dollars.

The reversal of Roe has hurt the Republicans and energized Democrats — just look at the 2022 midterms and the results from recent statewide ballot measures.

But Trump’s last 24 hours revealed how the abortion and IVF debate continue to be problematic for Republicans, even for a presidential candidate trying his best to sidestep the issues.


How Harris is preparing for her first Trump debate

By Yamiche Alcindor

Kamala Harris has been preparing for the debate stage for months. Only, instead of facing off against the GOP’s VP nominee as originally expected, she’s now set for her first showdown with Donald Trump in less than two weeks.

Here’s a look at how Harris is getting ready for the debate, according to four sources familiar with the Democratic nominee’s preparations.

Getting under Trump’s skin: A source told NBC News that while Harris’ team is preparing to talk about a variety of topics, the campaign very much views the optics of the debate as critically important. To that end, the source said, Harris and her team are focusing on homing in on how to needle Trump to rattle him.

In that sense, the source said, it’s going to be less about substance and more about showcasing Harris as a woman who isn’t scared and isn’t going to cower and who is standing up to Trump and holding him accountable.

Tension over how to differentiate from Biden: Drawing a distinction between Harris and Biden is a source of tension, as some on Harris’ team are taking the approach that she may have to respectfully but forcefully lay blame for some problems, like the Afghanistan withdrawal, squarely at Biden’s feet.

One source said the 2021 withdrawal is seen as an “obvious vulnerability” that Harris is preparing how to tackle.

Avoiding a Tulsi Gabbard moment: Harris and her team are most focused on avoiding a moment from a Democratic presidential primary debate in July 2019, when Tulsi Gabbard, then a House member from Hawaii, launched a lengthy attack on Harris’ prosecutorial record.

Gabbard (who recently endorsed Trump’s 2024 bid) accused Harris of having jailed more than 1,500 people for marijuana violations when she was a prosecutor in California, adding that she “laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana,” a jab that elicited applause from the audience.

Harris and her team were unprepared for the attack and are working to ensure she can quickly pivot in the face of a similar approach by Trump.

Read more from Yamiche on Harris’ debate prep →



Politics tamfitronics 🗞️ Today’s top stories

  • 📺 ICYMI: Here are the top takeaways from Harris’ first sit-down interview since rising to the top of the Democratic ticket. Read more →
  • 📬 Mixed messages: Elon Musk has attacked voting by mail, but records show he has done it twice in California. And his super PAC has sent mailers urging Wisconsin voters to apply for absentee ballots in support of Trump. Read more →
  • 📸 Look at this photograph: Trump said Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg “will spend the rest of his life in prison” if he does “anything illegal” to influence the presidential election, according to excerpts from the former president’s upcoming book of photographs. Read more →
  • 🗳️ The enemy of my enemy: The New York Times reports on how some Democratic operatives are boosting an anti-abortion third-party presidential candidate in hopes of eating into Trump’s support. Read more →
  • 👀 Inflation watch: Inflation ticked a bit higher last month, according to a measure favored by the Federal Reserve, ahead of expected rate cuts. Read more →
  • Play ball: The two Georgia election workers defamed by Rudy Giuliani are seeking to take possession of his multimillion-dollar homes in New York and Florida and some of his valuable personal property – including three Yankees World Series rings. Read more →
  • ⛳ Fore! Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is in hot water for a plan involving Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus to put golf courses in a state park. Read more →
  • Follow live 2024 election coverage here →
  • From the Politics Desk will be off Monday for Labor Day. We’ll be back in your inboxes on Tuesday, Sept. 3!

That’s all from the Politics Desk for now. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at [email protected]

And if you’re a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.



Politics
The Whirlwind Of Events Defies What We Know About The Slow Grind Of Politics

Politics tamfitronics

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo.Sign upfor the email version.

Politics tamfitronics History Comes At You Fast

The rapid-fire series of events over the past 18 days has been as mind-bending a stretch in American politics as I can remember.

Less than three weeks ago, Donald Trump was awaiting sentencing for his conviction in New York state on 34 felony counts and needed to win the presidential election to have any chance of avoiding additional criminal convictions and likely jail time.

Then came President Biden’s Thursday night debate debacleleaving the anti-Trump forces adrift in the doldrums over whether Biden should remain as the Democratic nominee.

The morning after the debate, the Supreme Court reset the playing field for most of the regulatory state, sweeping away its own precedent in Chevron and launching the political economy into a new era with uncertain but far-reaching implications that will take years to fully appreciate.

The following Monday, the Supreme Court rejiggered the balance of power carefully arranged by the founders in order to gift Trump an elaborately favorable ruling on presidential immunity that may keep him out of jail win or lose in November. As a result, his imminent sentencing in New York had to be postponed until at least September. But the constitutional framework will remain fundamentally altered long after Trump has passed from the political scene.

I wrote then that it had been a surreal week in our politics, but what’s happened since beggars belief.

After years of extolling violence and playing with the fire of incitement, Trump survived Saturday’s assassination attempt by a 20-year-old man with unclear motives who was immediately taken out by counter-sniper fire. The spasm of political violence at a campaign rally in western Pennsylvania killed one spectator and seriously wounded two others. It was captured in photos and video from a thousand different angles, yielding iconic images of a bleeding Trump with his fist raised exhorting the crowd to “Fight!”

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Yesterday, Trump secured another major win in his effort to stave off imprisonment when U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the Mar-a-Lago case against him in its entirety, freeing him for the moment from the threat of what had always been the most slam-dunk criminal case against him on the law and the facts, an assessment upended by Cannon’s corrupt handling of the case.

Within hours of Cannon’s ruling, having just announced Republican Sen. JD Vance of Ohio as his vice presidential running mate, Trump made a triumphal appearance at the first night of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, his wound from the weekend gunfire conspicuously bandaged. The crowd serenaded him with chants of “Fight! Fight! Fight!”

the whole RNC breaks out in a chant of “Fight! Fight! Fight!” pic.twitter.com/Ox1g8jGh3x

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 16, 2024

What we’ve all just witnessed with our own eyes — the breathtaking pace of events, the mix of staged and spontaneous spectacles, and Trump’s uncanny ability to emerge mostly unscathed through a combination of extreme good fortune and corrupt intervention on his behalf — have all the elements of a fictional political thriller, but one we would probably find preposterous for lack of believability. The whirlwind of political developments has defied what we know about the long, slow, grinding work of politics and political change.

For those desperate to see Trump as a larger-than-life hero touched by the divine, the past three weeks are irrefutable confirmation of everything they believed to be true about the man. For those appalled by the sinister impulses driving Trump and the dark forces he’s unleashed in America, his swift series of wins on the political and legal fronts is an inexplicable reward for such despicable behavior.

The unrelenting pace of events echoes 1968, the standard for tumultuous years in politics, with the assassinations, an incumbent Democratic president who is unpopular despite his historic legislative accomplishments, and his party’s convention in Chicago. The backdrop is different. Then it was the Vietnam War, white backlash to the civil rights movement, and a generational moment as the baby boomers came of age. Now it’s the existential threat of climate change and a far-right politics that makes even the worst fears of a prospective Richard Nixon presidency seem tepid by comparison. The white backlash remains and is, it seems, eternal.

Our faces are pressed too closely to the glass of current events to see what the past three weeks portend for the next few months. The past may be prologue, but past performance is no guarantee of future results. The intense pace is not likely sustainable, but anomalies happen. The impacts of each of these events on the election outcome is inscrutable; their collective impacts are indecipherable. We just don’t know. We pretend to know, sometimes, because it offers a respite from the doubt and confusion. But we don’t really know.

A more Zen person than I would urge you to embrace the uncertainty. I’m just trying to hold on for dear life.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!