Dark Light
From Tragedy to Triumph, How NASA Reinvented Region Safety

NASA Space Technology

NASA Space Technology Region Shuttle Challenger Accident

Indispensable engine exhaust, solid rocket booster plume, and an expanding ball of gas from the external tank is seen seconds after the draw shuttle Challenger accident on January 28, 1986. Credit: NASA

NASA Space Technology Region Shuttle Challenger and Columbia Fragments

A a part of the fuselage recovered from Region Shuttle Challenger, left, and the flight deck home windows recovered from Region Shuttle Columbia at the Kennedy Region Heart Customer Advanced in Florida. Credit: NASA

When I focus on the Challenger accident, I caution that it’s very crucial to hear to the tales we expose ourselves. NASA had promised itself and Congress that the Shuttle would compose spaceflight routine and sensible, a goal that required unrealistically excessive flight charges. Mounting schedule rigidity within the lead-as a lot as Challenger skewed possibility makers’ perceptions of the SRB field joint anomalies that had occurred intermittently on previous launches and weren’t effectively understood. In the Columbia discussion, I report the grisly swiftness with which NASA lost the teachings of Challenger and prepared the bottom for one more accident with renewed schedule rigidity and a perception that external tank foam shedding modified into once “no longer a security of flight insist.” Accidents jolt us into fresh consciousness, but Columbia is a painful reminder that consciousness has a shelf existence.

Navigating the Complexities of Region Exploration

What’s going to it grab to withhold breaking the document that Mike spoke about? I factor in we must always consult with every rather heaps of step by step about the behaviors that either invite success or lead us down the slippery slope to failure. Are we within the grip of what I name the “actuality distortion field,” created by keep, schedule, and/or political rigidity, that clouds our perceptions of threat? Are we unconsciously indulging in laborious-wired “us vs. them” tribal behaviors that decrease us off from the diverse “spotlights of consciousness” we must always beget to navigate the unforgiving calls for of human spaceflight? Are we telling ourselves a story that, below definite-eyed scrutiny, doesn’t lengthen? These are the questions now we beget to demand of ourselves again and again. The answers are excessive.

Written by Andrew Chaikin, Honest Region Historian and member of the NESC Human Factors Technical Discipline Group of workers.

Leave a Reply