Doesn’t – Tamfis

The US Army doesn’t comment on politics. An incident with Donald Trump has changed that

Politics tamfitronics

Key Points

The US Army has defended a cemetery employee who was “pushed aside” by a Donald Trump staffer during a visit.
The incident happened when Donald Trump staffers took videos in a section where political activities are not allowed.
The Army said it was “unfortunate” that the employee and her professionalism had been attacked.

The United States Army has defended an employee at a cemetery in Arlington, Virginia who was pushed aside by members of Donald Trump’s staff when the former US president visited the country’s most revered resting place for its dead troops.

The military — which maintains the Arlington National Cemetery — rarely comments on political matters.

While its statement on Thursday did not explicitly mention Trump or his 2024 presidential campaign, it referenced a Monday ceremony.

On that day Trump, the Republican candidate in the United States’ 5 November presidential election, visited the cemetery and took part in a wreath-laying ceremony honouring the 13 service members killed during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

His campaign posted photos from the visit, including one showing him giving a thumbs-up gesture while standing with relatives at the grave of one of the Marines killed.

He also visited Section 60 of the cemetery, where troops are buried and which is considered hallowed ground in the military.

Federal law and Pentagon policies do not allow political activities in that section of the cemetery, but Trump campaign staffers took videos there and used them in advertisements.

“An ANC (Arlington National Cemetery) employee who attempted to ensure adherence to these rules was abruptly pushed aside,” the Army statement said.

“This incident was unfortunate, and it is also unfortunate that the ANC employee and her professionalism has been unfairly attacked,” it added.

During a speech in Michigan on Thursday, Trump said families of service members who died in Afghanistan had asked him to go to Arlington National Cemetery and take photographs with them.

Politics tamfitronics Donald Trump walking down a flight of stairs, surrounded by men in suits.

Donald Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery on Monday to participate in a ceremony to mark three years since a 2021 suicide bombing at an airport in Afghanistan that killed 13 American service members. Source: Getty / Anna Moneymaker

“They love me and I love them,” Trump said.

Going on the offensive, Trump’s campaign co-manager Chris LaCivita has described the employee as a “despicable individual”.

Campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said she was “clearly suffering from a mental health episode” and “decided to physically block members of” Trump’s team.

Trump used the third anniversary of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan to try to pin the chaotic pullout on his Democratic rival for the White House, Kamala Harris.

The US military is meant to be apolitical, loyal to the US Constitution and independent of any party or political movement.

The Arlington cemetery incident has revived fears among some officials and experts that Trump could use the military for political purposes if he wins a second term.

While in office, Trump intervened and restored the rank of a Navy SEAL convicted of posing with the corpse of an Islamic State detainee and threatened to use US troops to put down protests across the US.

Since leaving office Trump has berated some military officials.

“We really did not want to get involved in this,” said a US military official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“But what happened (at Arlington) is not acceptable.”

The Army has said that it considers the matter closed since the employee did not press charges.

Dutton doesn’t realise importing US politics means the death of the Liberal Party

Politics tamfitronics

This article is an instalment of Where to for real Liberals?a series on the future of the Liberal Party under Peter Dutton.

Contemplating the future of the Liberal Party, institutions matter, especially the electoral system that stands between the voters and parties of government. Since the 2022 election, it has become clear that two distinctive features of Australia’s electoral system — compulsory and preferential voting — are not working in the Liberal Party’s favour.

On July 17 it will be one hundred years since legislation was passed to make voting compulsory in Australia’s federal elections. It was a private members’ bill supported by all parties and it went through both houses in less than a day. The states followed in their own time. Queensland had already introduced it, in 1915. The Australian Workers’ Union was encouraging itinerant rural workers to vote, and conservative premier Digby Denham thought that compulsion would force apathetic Liberals to the polls and return him to government. He was wrong. A 5% swing gave Labor a majority and it began an election-winning run in Queensland that lasted until 1929.

Compulsory voting institutionalised Australia as a majoritarian democracy — one in which governments are supported by the majority of voters, not just the majority of those who turn out. And it made for more egalitarian policies. In voluntary systems, those least likely to vote are the poor and marginalised, which encourages politicians to ignore their needs in favour of the comfortable and well-off.

Without compulsory voting, I doubt if we would still have a national health scheme. The Coalition opposed it in its first iteration as Medibank under the Whitlam government, abolished it when it returned to office under Fraser, and opposed it again when it was reintroduced as Medicare by Hawke. It kept up the opposition for an election-losing decade until, in 1996, after John Howard won in a landslide, he said that the rejection of Medicare had been a mistake.

Because the law rather than the parties get out the vote, compulsory voting favours the centre by weakening the influence of zealots at either end of the political spectrum. A party’s passionate base is tempered with the votes of the moderate and indifferent. In voluntary systems by contrast, parties are tempted to stress highly emotive issues to bolster the turnout, especially those to do with sexuality and religion as we see in the US.

It doesn’t really work here. When the Liberal Party ran anti-trans candidate Katherine Deves in Warringah in 2022, they won just 32.4% of the first preference vote in what was once a safe Liberal seat.

Preferential voting was introduced in 1918 after pressure from farmers’ groups who wanted their own party without the risk of losing the seat to Labor in three-way contests. It soon led to the formation of the Country Party and coalition governments, and it has enabled minor parties to come and go: the Democratic Labor Party in the 1950s, the Australian Democrats in the 1980s and 1990s, the Greens and One Nation in more recent times. All existed because of preferential voting. So do the teals, who present an unprecedented challenge to the Liberals, one they did not see coming and seem to have no idea how to meet.

For the past few decades, the major parties have been losing life-long rusted-on voters. This results in fewer safe seats and the trend is accelerating. At the 2019 election, 46 of the 151 seats in the House of Representatives seats were decided on first preferences. At the 2022 election, this plummeted to 15. All the rest went to preferences, including the six heartland seats that the Liberal Party lost to the teal independent candidates.

Since Pauline Hanson brought her politics of white grievance into federal Parliament, the Liberal Party and its coalition partner, the Nationals, have fretted about their loss of first preferences to the right — to One Nation in particular and more recently to Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party. As Liberal prime minister, John Howard tried hard not to alienate One Nation voters. He wanted to show that he could feel their pain so that their preferences would come back to the Coalition.

Labor similarly has lost first preferences to the Greens on the left, but again these progressive preferences mostly come back to Labor, though the Greens now have four seats won on preferences and leader Adam Bandt is within a whisker of winning Melbourne on first preferences. With both parties of government protecting their outside flanks, it looked as if the electorate was becoming more divided, with a weaker centre and the risk of the hyper-partisanship that afflicts contemporary US politics.

But this depleted centre has now been captured by competent, professional, middle-aged women. They are not the cookie-cutter candidates of either side: neither private school-entitled young men nor trade union officials and political staffers, but people with real-world life skills and rungs on the board, people who are acceptable to disaffected Liberal voters who would never vote for the party of organised labour.

Australian politics, on the whole, is won or lost in the centre. Peter Dutton, along with many media commentators, are misled when they think that Australia is following the trajectory of the United States into increasing polarisation where disaffected margins can be played off against a perceived entitled elite.

The combination of compulsory and preferential voting gives Australian politics a flexibility unavailable to its electorally sclerotic ally. It allows new political formations that reflect shifts in the views and makeup of the electorate. As the Liberal Party has moved to the right, looking more and more like its coalition ally, compulsory preferential voting has enabled the moderate centre it once represented to find new candidates.

That Peter Dutton has scorned them does not auger well for his party’s future.

Does the Liberal Party need to regain moderates to reclaim power? Let us know your thoughts by writing to[email protected]. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.

It Doesn’t Steal Long to Reset Your Intestine Smartly being With Puny Each day life Modifications

Lifestyle Many things can throw one’s microbiome out of kilter. Not eating ample fiber or relying too extra special on highly processed food can starve the “factual micro organism” build on your intestine. Frequent and sustained antibiotic exhaust can additionally unintentionally homicide them off.

With this day’s busy schedule, many folk forgo the things that save factual intestine health. “Fresh lifestyles hit the microbiome at many diversified angles,” says Christopher Dammana gastroenterologist at the University of Washington in Seattle.

One learn shining build? The microbiome appears to be to be extremely resilient. And a few straightforward dietary shifts can make an nearly instantaneous impact.

Lifestyle How Long Does it Steal to Enhance Intestine Smartly being?

With learn within the intestine microbiome — the hundreds of microorganisms that reside in our digestive draw — booming in the course of the final decade or so, scientists have explored how intestine health can impact points treasure irritation, metabolism, and immune health besides to psychological health and overall neatly-being.

In one secret agentresearchers fed one crew of individuals a plant-based mostly completely completely weight-reduction plan and one more one heavy on meat, nonetheless low on fiber. The microbiomes of each and every groups modified enormously internal 24 hours. They additionally “bounced aid” when the issues reverted to their traditional weight-reduction plan.

That’s factual to know, on anecdote of it demonstrates that dinky daily life lapses want no longer be devastating to your microbiome.

“Regardless that it shifts without notice, if you mosey aid to what you doubtlessly did before, this could perhaps likely revert aid,” says Gail Crescia intestine microbiome researcher at the Cleveland Sanatorium.

Regulate to-up work confirmed that eating a intestine-pleasant weight-reduction plan for about six months helped solidify sure changes to the intestine.

Lifestyle Including Prebiotics and Probiotics to Your Diet

So, what’s the explicit dietary procedure to save a couple of up watch over your intestine? The immediate resolution is prebiotics and probiotics.

Prebiotics attain from unprocessed fiber-neatly off whole foods treasure fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts and legumes. Probiotics attain from fermented food treasure kefir, sauerkraut, and kimchi.

Prebiotics are the food supply for the intestine microbiota and probiotics are the factual microbes. Each and every prebiotics and probiotics are realized naturally in obvious foods, or they would additionally be dietary supplements.

Lifestyle Metabolites within the Intestine Microbiome

When we eat foods with prebiotics, we don’t within the origin shatter them down entirely. That’s the keep the microbiome comes in. Micro organism within the intestine can metabolize the fiber-neatly off food, and this helps make stronger a wholesome stability of factual intestine micro organism besides to allow the factual micro organism to get metabolites. Those metabolites attain in a differ of molecules that abet the body in varied methods, says Cresci.

Complicating issues, diversified kinds of fiber get diversified metabolites — which have varied advantages to the body.

“When we originate up taking diversified fibers from diversified sources, the biological impacts are pretty diversified,” Andrew Gewirtza Georgia Say University researcher says.

Gewirtz is now maintaining apart varied kinds of fiber to better realize the inform roles every plays. Some fibers even get the the same kinds of reactions as medication treasure Ozempic.

Lifestyle Intellectual the Most attention-grabbing Invent of Fiber to Steal

Fiber added to a highly processed food could perhaps no longer act as potently as the fiber from a extra natural source. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) modified a labelling requirement years within the past that no longer differentiates between, say, the fiber from a multi-grain artisanal loaf of bread and a “fiber-enhanced” brownie that additionally contains many additives.

Fiber supplements can additionally be tricky. “You are most productive getting upright what is within the complement and nothing else,” Carrie Daniel-MacDougallpartner professor of Epidemiology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Most cancers Center, says.

A prebiotic food in overall gives upward thrust to many factual metabolites, she adds. To place the the same prebiotic aid as, say, a cup of beans, you’d must take a handful of diversified supplements.

Damman adds that he’s no longer entirely in opposition to fiber supplements — so long as they are, indeed, a complement, and no longer another option to naturally occurring fiber.

“I am additionally a pragmatist and acknowledge a busy daily life,” Damman says. “It is better than nothing.”

Lifestyle Including Probiotics to Your Microbiome

Probiotics — by plot of how they work within the body — are pretty straightforward. You will need the chance so as to add micro organism from fermented foods treasure yogurt, sauerkraut, or kimchi straight to your intestine. Each and every food contains multiple traces of micro organism. Each and every form, when fed, could perhaps get multiple metabolites. So, as in fiber sources, a differ of probiotic food sources shall be extra helpful than a single one.

Probiotic supplements must additionally be in moderation regarded as, Damman says. For the reason that contents of such supplements are no longer regulated by the FDA, you can no longer be getting precisely what the imprint says.

“Fair groups have evaluated off-the-shelf probiotics,” Damman says. “And it be genuinely elegant upright how substandard the correlations are between what the imprint says and what’s genuinely in there.”

Even probiotic supplements with identical-sounding names could perhaps no longer be honest, on anecdote of diversified subspecies will have diversified results. “That adds a selection of complexity to the probiotic build,” Damman says.

Lifestyle Researching the Advantages of Intestine Smartly being

That’s no longer to train there aren’t stipulations or treatments that can’t be helped by inform probiotics, though. Nonetheless, in those cases, it will likely be supreme to turn to a health care provider or a registered dietitian.

Focused approaches aiming at intestine health are in earlier learn stages. Daniel-MacDougall is how boosting the microbiome helps the immune drawwhich, in turn could perhaps abet cancer sufferers. Cresci is inspecting how dietary approaches focusing on the human intestine microbiome could perhaps restore a number of the mobile and immune draw damage resulted in by alcohol. And Gewirtz has studied the impact of the microbiome on each and every diabetes and obesity.

Nonetheless, Mingyang SongHarvard T. H. Chan College of Public Smartly being epidemiologist, cautions that a tailor-made procedure to treating many diseases thru the microbiome must be a within the waste.

“It’s a extraordinarily attention-grabbing idea, on condition that the microbiome is so crucial to health,” he says.

Nevertheless Song additionally says it could perhaps perhaps even be exhausting to “tease apart” the microbiome’s contribution to inform health points. As an instance, the the same extra or much less weight-reduction plan that promotes a wholesome microbiome has been linked to a decrease incidence of colon cancer. Nevertheless he’s uncertain if the microbiome is a “mediator” or upright on “standby.”

That’s no longer to train that a wholesome microbiome doesn’t contribute to overall factual health. The microbiome is probably going acting in concert with a differ of alternative processes.

Song additionally recommends a weight-reduction plan alongside side fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. He acknowledges that requires extra work than taking a complement or single “helpful” food.

“Of us treasure to have the ‘magic bullet’,” Song says. “Unfortunately, it’s no longer that easy.”

Lifestyle Article Sources

Our writers at Discovermagazine.com exhaust seek-reviewed stories and excessive quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial requirements. Overview the sources weak below for this article:

Nature. Diet without notice and reproducibly alters the human intestine microbiome.
Wiley On-line Library. The Intestine Microbiome: A Fresh Frontier for Alcohol Investigation.
National Library of Medication. Fiber-Mediated Nourishment of Intestine Microbiota Protects in opposition to Diet-Brought about Obesity by Restoring IL-22-Mediated Colonic Smartly being.
Gastroenterology. Affect of the Intestine Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Possibility of Colorectal Most cancers.

Previous to becoming a member of Sight Journal, Paul Smaglik spent over Twenty years as a science journalist, that specialise in U.S. lifestyles science coverage and global scientific occupation points. He began his occupation in newspapers, nonetheless switched to scientific magazines. His work has seemed in publications alongside side Science News, Science, Nature, and Scientific American.

Tag Archives: Doesn’t